Before the emergence
of “the self-made man”, humanism substituted the ideal of personal success for
the classical notion of sanctity that, elevated beyond reach, is still
misunderstood. As a spiritual concept it used to inspire mankind toward something greater than
itself, uniting all aspects of humanity by amalgamating cultural, intellectual
and spiritual ideas. It wasn’t the exclusivity of super-humans, but an
aspiration for what is greater than ordinary, a striving for personal
excellence. Later the focus shifted from communal wellbeing to individual
success and boundless honors were then given to personal achievements, attained
in one field or expressed in another. From this point on, the dominant culture elevated
private triumphs over the common good and the split endured till today. The
result is a blatant celebration of the Successful Man, a cult of the individual
raised as Caesar, emperor and even a demi-god worthy of public worship.
We needn’t
look far to discover a sparkling constellation of exalted athletes, movie stars,
internet titans and industrial giants, who placed hope in their own strengths,
competed and won. Now what matters most is to make life a success, to be famous
and receive acknowledgement, status and praise. The obsession is to win
admiration at any cost, and it matters not whether it is on TV, in sports, the arts,
politics or business. The siren call is inescapable, “Worthy of heaven are
those who do great things on earth!” But what if one isn’t talented? What if circumstances
aren’t favorable? What if one falls on bad times? Is there honor without
worldly success? What’s the score outside the circles of opportunity? Are the
sick and weak worth nothing? The seeds of many evils wait to germinate trampled
by the feet of the Goddess of Fortune. May we cultivate a community enriched by ideals of distributive giving
and belonging, instead of individual rights.